Archive for Gramophone Company

Gramophone Company (U.K.)

Posted in 78 RPM Label Discography, 78 RPM Record Development with tags , , , , , , , , on March 13, 2013 by the78rpmrecordspins

Gramophone Company

From Wikipedia
 

The Gramophone Company, based in the United Kingdom, was one of the early recording companies, and was the parent organization for the famous “His Master’s Voice” (HMV) label. Although the company was merged with another in 1931 to form Electric and Musical Industries Limited (EMI), the company title as “The Gramophone Company Limited” continued in use in the UK into the 1970s, for instance on sleeves and labels of records (such as The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd, vinyl copies of which bear the copyright notice “©1973 The Gramophone Company, Ltd.”).

History

The UK Gramophone Company was founded by William Barry Owen and his partner/investor Trevor Williams in 1897 as the UK partner of Emile Berliner‘s United States basedUnited States Gramophone Company, which had been founded in 1892. In December 1900, William Owen gained the manufacturing rights for the Lambert Typewriter Company and The Gramophone Company was for a few years renamed to the Gramophone & Typewriter Ltd.

The Gramophone Co. trademark as it appeared on the reverse of early single sided British Gramophone records.

An early Gramophone Co. record label showing the original Trademark

An early Gramophone Co. record label showing the HMV Trademark

In 1900, the United States branch of Gramophone lost a patent infringement suit, brought on by Columbia Records and Zonophone, and was no longer permitted to produce records in the USA. Gramophone’s talking machine manufacturer, Eldridge R. Johnson, being left with a large factory and thousands of talking machines with no records to play on them, filed suit that year to be permitted to make records himself, and won, in spite of the negative verdict against Berliner.

This victory by Johnson, which would be used in naming the new record company the Victor Talking Machine Company he would found the following year, may have been in part due to a patent-pooling handshake agreement with Columbia that allowed the latter to begin producing flat records themselves, which they began doing in 1901, (all Columbia records had previously been cylinders). Contrary to some sources, the Victor Talking Machine Company was never a branch or subsidiary of Gramophone, as Johnson’s manufactory, which had been making talking machines for Berliner, was his own company with many mechanical patents that he owned, which patents were valuable in the patent pool agreement with Columbia. Thus, Victor and Columbia began making flat records in America, with UK Gramophone and others continuing to do so outside America, leaving Edison as the only major player in the making of cylinders (Columbia still made a limited number for a few years), and Emile Berliner, the inventor of flat records, out of the business. All he was left with were the master recordings of his earlier records, which he took to Canada and reformed his Berliner label in Montreal, Nipper logo and all. Edison would soon join the flat record market with his diamond discs and their players.

A public relations triumph of 1907 involved Alfred Clark, a New York representative of the company. Clark encouraged the Paris Opera to seal and lock 24 records in two iron and lead containers in a basement storage room at the opera. These were to be opened in 100 years. 24 more records were added to the first group in two additional containers in 1912, along with a hand-crank gramophone with spare stylus needles to insure the records could be played when unsealed. In 1989, it was discovered that one of the 1912 containers had been opened and emptied and the gramophone stolen. The three remaining containers were moved to the French National Library. When opened in December 2007, some of the records were broken but copies of all the missing and broken records were located in the French National Library. EMI digitized the collection and released it on three compact discs in February 2009 as “Les Urnes de l’Opera”.

In February 1909, the company introduced new labels featuring the famous trademark known as “His Master’s Voice“, generally referred to as HMV, to distinguish them from earlier labels which featured an outline of the Recording Angel trademark. The latter had been designed by Theodore Birnbaum, an executive of the Gramophone Company pressing plant in HanoverGermany. The Gramophone Company was never known as the HMV or His Master’s Voice company. An icon of the company was to become very well known – the picture of a dog listening to an early gramophone painted in England by Francis Barraud. The painting “His Master’s Voice” was made in the 1890s with the dog listening to an Edison cylinder Phonograph, which was capable of recording as well as playing, but Thomas Edison did not buy the painting.

In 1899, Owen bought the painting from the artist, and asked him to paint over the Edison machine with a Gramophone, which he did. Technically, since Gramophones did not record, the new version of the painting makes no sense, as the dog would not have been able to listen to his master’s voice (the master being Barraud’s deceased brother). In 1902, Eldridge Johnson of Victor Talking Machine Company acquired US rights to use it as the Victor trademark, which began appearing on Victor records that year. UK rights to the logo were reserved by Gramophone. Nipper lived from 1884 to 1895 and is buried in England with a celebrated grave marker.

In March 1931 The Gramophone Company merged with Columbia Graphophone Company to form Electric and Musical Industries Ltd (EMI). The “Gramophone Company, Ltd.” name, however, continued to be used for many decades, especially for copyright notices on records. Gramophone Company of India was formed in 1946. The Gramophone Company Ltd legal entity was renamed EMI Records Ltd in 1973. For later history of the company, see EMI.

An Interview with the Inventor of the Gramophone (courtesy of APN, July, 2010)

Posted in Interviews and Articles with tags , , , , , , , on March 5, 2013 by the78rpmrecordspins

An Interview with the Inventor of the Gramophone 
Canadian Music and Trades Journal, September 1918

Mr. Emile Berliner, of Washington, D.C., inventor and pantentee of the gramophone, and president of the Berliner Gramophone Co. Ltd., Montreal, when on a visit to the latter city recently accorded the Journal a very interesting interview. Mr. Berliner was visited in the laboratory of the firm which he founded and the active direction of which is in the hands of his son, Mr. H.S. Berliner, vice-president of the firm.

To visit this laboratory to which the Journal was admitted, is a privilege accorded to few, and its secrets are as rigorously guarded as were, according to history, the mysteries of the sanctum sanctorum of Solomon’s Temple. The laboratory is on the third floor of the building and its equipment lacks nothing that it is possible to construct or purchase to the advantage of research work in improving recording processes or the material entering the physical make-up of the record. The visitor to the laboratory sees a series of bottles of various coloured and colourless liquids that suggest chemistry. There are Bunsen burners, retorts, electric ovens, microscopes and an equipment of fine tools that suggest a modern engraving plant, a watchmaker’s equipment and still more unusual contrivances that mostly suggest mystery.

Mr. Berliner’s mission to Canada on this occasion was to collaborate with his son in experimental work having in view further refinement in recording and improvement in materials, so that the heretofore normal wastage of matrices in record manufacture should be still further reduced. That they were successful it was unnecessary to inquire. The satisfaction of achievement showed from the eminent inventor’s countenance. But, as he modestly suggested, he had the advantage of so many years of experimental work that he knew from previous results where it would be unnecessary to explore, and much time was saved. On the other hand, a new phase or development carried him back to former completed or incompleted experiments that he could at once take up and carry to the conclusion required by the demands of present development.

The Journal wanted to know what attracted Mr. Berliner into the field of sound reproduction in the first place. He patiently explained that having been engaged in the telephone business it was natural that he should become interested in so kindred a science as that of sound reproduction.

“Then what gave you the idea of establishing a business in Canada, particularly at a period when this country was so little known or regarded in the United States?” questioned the inquisitive Journal representative.

“It was a matter of protecting patents,” explained Mr. Berliner. “I thought it wise even then to be protected in this country, and the subsequent manufacture of records was actually to protect these patents rather than the definite purpose of establishing an industry here and,” he added, with a twinkle in his eye, “you never can tell what is going to become of a baby.”

The famous “dog on it” was first trade-marked in Canada – and this is news to many readers of the Journal; then in the United States. The picture, as such, had already been copyrighted in England, where in the office of the Gramophone Co. Ltd., the original still hangs. It is of interest that this dog was first offered to another company in London, England, and when first submitted to the general manager of the London Gramophone Company the picture was of a cylinder machine. On his suggestion this was changed to a gramophone and the picture was printed and distributed as an interesting adjunct to gramophone propaganda. When a copy reached Mr. Berliner, he immediately saw its value as a trademark, and its success as such all over the world proved Mr. Berliner’s good judgment.

Thirty years ago, or to be exact, on May 16, 1888, Mr. Berliner in an address to the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia, made the following predictions: –

“A standard reproducing apparatus, simple in construction and easily manipulated, will at a moderate selling price, be placed on the market.

“Those having one may then buy an assortment of Phonautograms, to be increased occasionally, comprising recitations, songs, chorus and instrumental solos or orchestral pieces of every variety.

“Prominent singers, speakers or performers may derive an income from royalties on the sale of their phonautograms and valuable plates may be printed and registered to protect against unauthorized publication.

“Collections of phonautograms may become very valuable, and whole evenings will be spent at home going through a long list of interesting performances.

“Languages can be taught by having a good elocutionist speak classical recitations and sell copies of his voice to students. In this department alone, and that of teaching elocution generally, an immense field is to be filled by the gramophone.

“Addresses – congratulatory, political or otherwise – can be delivered by proxy so loudly that the audience will be almost as if conscious of the speaker’s presence.

“A singer unable to appear at a concert may send her voice and be represented as per programme, and conventions will listen to distant sympathizers, be they thousands of miles away.”

At that time there was intense interest in the discovery that it was possible to reproduce the human voice, which discovery was the outcome of the development of the science of transmitting the human voice through the medium of what is now the telephone. Although the discovery that led to the establishment of the talking machine industries dates back to 1877, it was not until the year 1895 that the industry, then a feeble, ill-nourished infant, with few who had faith in its ever coming to healthy childhood, to say nothing of maturity, can be said to have been founded, and it is doubtful if even the scientists and inventors present in Mr. Berliner’s audience of that May evening thirty years ago thought his invention would be other than a scientific wonder, or perhaps a toy.

But his predictions have been realized, and more. Mr. Berliner had and still retains that rare combination of inventive genius and business acumen. This could be deducted from his predictions quoted above, as well as from the fact that he anticipated the development of the talking machine industry in other countries, when he secured his patents and trade-mark copyrights and later protected them by manufacturing.

The Journal’s numerous questions anent the discovery and development of sound production caused Mr. Berliner in his turn to ask a question.

“What,” he said, is the most wonderful thing about sound reproduction?”

“That the human voice could be recorded at all,” answered the Journal.

“No, not only that,” he corrected, “but that all the tones of all the instruments in an entire orchestra can run off from a single finely pointed needle.”

Even to the scientist, and to the inventor, the marvel of it remains.

In his laboratory Mr. Berliner works quickly, and with enthusiasm. He can work for days on an idea with apparently no prospective success without the slightest impatience, but when a result is achieved his pleasure is of that boyish delight that retains for him perpetual youth. Unlike the average inventor, he knows when to discard an experiment that could lead to no result.

He motored up from Washington to Montreal and though Mrs. Berliner, who came with him, took the train westward, he proposed to motor back, visiting several points on the way. He thoroughly enjoyed his trip, his visit to Montreal, his experiments and meeting “the boys” of the plant, who have brought the tiny infant of eighteen years ago to the state of healthy activity it today enjoys.

The Journal man thinking that Toronto was the only place to have established the business, Mr. Berliner was asked why he chose Montreal. The latter city was then, as now, Canada’s telephone headquarters, and personal friendship with officials of the Bell Telephone Co. led him to communicate with them regarding facilities for pressing records and which were found in Montreal.

In this connection it is an interesting contrast that the day’s output of records at the commencement could be carried by one man on his shoulder. The contrast is not only the thousands of records now produced daily, but that one small dealer in a village will now sell more records in a day than the daily factory output of 1900, and yet record business has barely commenced.

So mysterious is the sound of human voices coming from a cabinet that it would not be surprising if one could smell the singer’s breath, just as the dog has been parodied as whiffing “his master’s vice”. Here is an incident in which the listener also scented the singer’s voice. An Auxetophone was once presented to Mr. Berliner by one of his boys. This Auxetophone was designed to enlarge the volume of the gramophone tone. An electric motor and series of bellows were used. In his home in Washington, Mr. Berliner installed the Auxetophone in the reception hall. The motor and air pump for forcing air through the valve of the Auxetophone he had placed on the other side of a partition, which put them in the pantry adjoining the kitchen. A visiting friend was being shown the new wonder, and when asked whom he would like to hear sing, he quite naturally asked for Caruso. He listened most intently, and the more he listened the more mystified he became. When the song was finished he exclaimed, “That’s Caruso, without a doubt but – my God, I can smell the onions on that dago’s breath!” So he could smell onions, but they were not on Caruso’s breath as he thought. In the kitchen the cook was frying onions and the pump drawing in its supply of air failed to discriminate between onion-scented and otherwise, hence the mystification of the guest.

To the layman that sound could be reproduced at all, and that so delicate and marvellous an accomplishment could ever be possible scientifically and commercially, is always uncanny, but to those in the business the problem of problems is materials for the manufacture of records. It was so from the commencement and Mr. Berliner in an address to the Franklin Institute in 1913, tells that the first successful results of the duplicating process on which he had worked for several years was a record pressed in celluloid by J.W. Hyatt, well known as one of the inventors of celluloid.

This duplicate is still in existence in the National Museum in Washington, being the first sound record duplicated in hard material which was made by pressing a reverse of the original record into hard material, while the latter was softened by heat and chilling while still under pressure. This pressure is the basis of the present industry of making millions of records yearly. There is also a record etched on plate glass deposited in the National Museum at Washington.

“Did it ever occur to you,” asked Mr. Berliner, “that records are in reality seals of the human voice? This substance they are made of is a modified sealing wax, both containing shellac as a basic substance. Few people have a conception of the untiring efforts which have been made year after year, and still continue, in order to obtain a composition which will answer all the requirements necessary for resisting the wear of the needle or prevent the latter from being ground blunt too fast. If the material is too hard and gritty it will wear the point of the needle so that before the end of the record is reached the reproduction becomes weak or blurred. If the material is too soft the record groove will quickly wear rough and the record reproduction become scratchy. Shellac is much adulterated and the mineral and fibrous substances which are added require careful selection, and this whole department is in the hands of experts who do nothing else all the year around but test the substances and the mixing processes which are employed for producing record material.”

Mr. Berliner was well known in the telephone field before he attacked the talking machine problem. He invented the loose contact telephone transmitter in 1877, and no other transmitter has ever been used since. He added the use of the induction coil to the telephone in the same year, without which practical long distance telephoning is impossible. He also perfected the early Blake type of loose contact transmitters, and the first 20,000 transmitters ever placed in the hands of the public were personally tested by him while Chief Instrument Inspector of the Bell Telephone Company. This was in 1879.

In his public addresses and private conversation Mr. Berliner is always most generous in giving credit to contemporary inventors in the field of sound reproduction. He has contributed valuable information to the scientific world and in his inventions has given humanity entertainment, education and instruction to an extent that no individual can realize. Unlike most inventors, too, he has made his work pay.

Financially he is as great a success as he is in the scientific world. Apart from his interest in the Canadian business he has large interests in the Victor Talking Machine Company and the Gramophone Co., Ltd. He has also been active in the aeroplane industry and in torpedo invention.

From Canadian Music and Trades Journal, Vol. 19 #4, pages 84-86, September 1918.
Courtesy Arthur Zimmerman

78 RPM Disc Developments

Posted in 78 RPM Record Development with tags , , , , , , , on February 22, 2013 by the78rpmrecordspins

Hungarian Pathé record, 90 to 100 rpm

Early speeds

Early disc recordings were produced in a variety of speeds ranging from 60 to 130 rpm, and a variety of sizes. As early as 1894, Emile Berliner‘s United States Gramophone Company was selling single-sided 7-inch discs with an advertised standard speed of “about 70 rpm”.

One standard audio recording handbook describes speed regulators or “governors” as being part of a wave of improvement introduced rapidly after 1897. A picture of a hand-cranked 1898 Berliner Gramophone shows a governor. It says that spring drives replaced hand drives. It notes that:

“The speed regulator was furnished with an indicator that showed the speed when the machine was running so that the records, on reproduction, could be revolved at exactly the same speed…The literature does not disclose why 78 rpm was chosen for the phonograph industry, apparently this just happened to be the speed created by one of the early machines and, for no other reason continued to be used.”

A multinational product: a duet sung in Italian, recorded in the U.S. in 1906 by the Victor Talking Machine Company, manufactured c. 1908 in Hanover, Germany forThe Gramophone Company, Victor’s affiliate in England.

By 1925, the speed of the record was becoming standardized at a nominal value of 78 rpm. However, the standard was to differ between countries with their alternating current electricity supply running at 60 cycles per second (now Hertz) and the rest of the world. The actual 78 speed within regions with 60 Hertz mains was 78.26 rpm, being the speed of a 3600 rpm synchronous motor reduced by 46:1 gearing. Throughout other countries, 77.92 rpm was adopted being the speed of a 3000 rpm synchronous motor powered by a 50 Hz supply and reduced by 77:2 gearing.

“Acoustical” recording

Early recordings were made entirely acoustically, the sound being collected by a horn and piped to a diaphragm which vibrated the cutting stylus. Sensitivity and frequency range were poor, and frequency response was very irregular, giving acoustic recordings an instantly recognizable tonal quality. A singer practically had to put his face in the recording horn. Lower orchestral instruments such as cellos and double basses were often doubled (or replaced) by louder wind instruments, such as tubas. Standard violins in orchestral ensembles were commonly replaced by Stroh violins which became popular with recording studios.

Contrary to popular belief, if placed properly and prepared-for, drums could be effectively used and heard on even the earliest jazz and military band recordings. The loudest instruments stood the farthest away from the collecting horn. Lillian Hardin Armstrong, a member of King Oliver’s Creole Jazz Band that recorded at Gennett Records in 1923, remembered that at first Oliver and his young second trumpet, Louis Armstrong, stood next to each other and Oliver’s horn could not be heard. “They put Louis about fifteen feet over in the corner, looking all sad.”

For level fading instrumental parts in and out while recording, some performers were placed on a moveable platform, which could draw the performer(s) nearer or further away as required.

“Electrical” recording

An “electrically” (electronically) recorded disc from Carl Lindström AG, Germany, c. 1930

During the first half of the 1920s, engineers at Western Electric, as well as independent inventors such asOrlando Marsh, developed technology for capturing sound with a microphone, amplifying it with vacuum tubes, then using the amplified signal to drive an electromagnetic recording head. Western Electric’s innovations resulted in a greatly expanded and more even frequency response, creating a dramatically fuller, clearer and more natural-sounding recording. Distant or feeble sounds that were impossible to record by the old method could now be captured. Volume was limited only by the groove spacing on the record and the limitations of the intended playback device. Victor and Columbia licensed the new system from Western Electric and began issuing electrically recorded discs in 1925.

Although the technology used vacuum tubes and today would be described as “electronic”, at the time it was referred to as “electrical”. A 1926 Wanamaker’s ad in The New York Times offers records “by the latest Victor process of electrical recording.”  It was recognized as a breakthrough; in 1930, a Times music critic stated:

“… the time has come for serious musical criticism to take account of performances of great music reproduced by means of the records. To claim that the records have succeeded in exact and complete reproduction of all details of symphonic or operatic performances … would be extravagant … [but] the article of today is so far in advance of the old machines as hardly to admit classification under the same name. Electrical recording and reproduction have combined to retain vitality and color in recitals by proxy.”

Examples of Congolese 78 rpm records

A 10-inch Decelith blank for making an individually cut one-off recording. A German product introduced in 1937, these flexible all-plastic discs were a European alternative to rigid-based lacquer (“acetate”) discs.

Electrical recording preceded electrical home reproduction because of the initial high cost of the electronics. In 1925, the Victor company introduced the groundbreaking Victor Orthophonic Victrola, an acoustical record player that was specifically designed to play electrically recorded discs, as part of a line that also included electrically reproducing “Electrolas.” The acoustical Orthophonics ranged in price from US$95 to US$300, depending on cabinetry; by comparison, the cheapest Electrola cost US$650, the price of a new Ford automobile in an era when clerical jobs paid about $20 a week.

The Orthophonic had an interior folded exponential horn, a sophisticated design informed by impedance-matching and transmission-linetheory, and designed to provide a relatively flat frequency response. Its first public demonstration was front-page news in the New York Times, which reported that:

“The audience broke into applause … John Philip Sousa [said]: ‘[Gentlemen], that is a band. This is the first time I have ever heard music with any soul to it produced by a mechanical talking machine’ … The new instrument is a feat of mathematics and physics. It is not the result of innumerable experiments, but was worked out on paper in advance of being built in the laboratory … The new machine has a range of from 100 to 5,000 [cycles], or five and a half octaves … The ‘phonograph tone’ is eliminated by the new recording and reproducing process.”

Gradually, electrical reproduction entered the home. The spring motor was replaced by an electric motor. The old “sound box” with its needle-linked diaphragm was replaced by an electromagnetic “pickup” that converted the needle vibrations into an electrical signal. The “tone arm” now served to conduct a pair of wires, not sound waves, into the cabinet. The exponential horn was replaced by an amplifier and a loudspeaker.

78 rpm materials

The earliest disc records (1889–1894) were made of various materials including hard rubber. Around 1895, a shellac-based compound was introduced and became standard. Exact formulas for this compound varied by manufacturer and over the course of time, but it was typically composed of about one-third shellac and about two-thirds “mineral filler”, which meant finely pulverized rock, usually slate andlimestone, with an admixture of cotton fibers to add tensile strength, carbon black for color (without this, it tended to be a “dirty” gray or brown color that most record companies considered unattractive), and a very small amount of a lubricant to facilitate mold release during manufacture. Some makers, notably Columbia Records, used a laminated construction with a core disc of coarser material or fiber. The production of shellac records continued until the end of the 78 rpm format (i.e., the late 1950s in most developed countries, but well into the 1960s in some other places), but increasingly less abrasive formulations were used during its declining years and very late examples in truly like-new condition can be nearly as noiseless as vinyl.

Flexible or so-called “unbreakable” records made of unusual materials were introduced by a number of manufacturers at various times during the 78 rpm era. In the UK, Nicole records, made of celluloid or a similar substance coated onto a cardboard core disc, were produced for a few years beginning in 1904, but they suffered from an exceptionally high level of surface noise. In the United States, Columbia Records introduced flexible, fiber-cored “Marconi Velvet Tone Record” pressings in 1907, but the advantages and longevity of their relatively noiseless surfaces depended on the scrupulous use of special gold-plated Marconi Needles and the product was not a success. Thin, flexible plastic records such as the German Phonycord and the British Filmophone and Goodson records appeared around 1930 but also did not last long. The contemporary French Pathé Cellodiscs, made of a very thin black plastic which uncannily resembles the vinyl “sound sheet” magazine inserts of the 1965-1985 era, were similarly short-lived. In the United States, Hit of the Week Records, made of a patented blend of transparent plastic on a heavy brown paper base called Durium, were introduced in early 1930. A new issue came out every week and they were available at newsstands like a weekly magazine. Although inexpensive and moderately popular at first, they soon fell victim to the Great Depression and production ceased in the United States in 1932. Related Durium records continued to be made somewhat later in the UK and elsewhere, and as remarkably late as 1950 in Italy, where the name “Durium” survived far into the LP era as a trademark on ordinary vinyl records. Despite all these attempts at innovation, shellac compounds continued to be used for the overwhelming majority of commercial 78 rpm records during the life of the format.

In 1931, RCA Victor introduced their vinyl-based “Victrolac” compound as a material for some unusual-format and special-purpose records. By the end of the 1930s vinyl’s advantages of light weight, relative unbreakability and low surface noise had made it the material of choice for prerecorded radio programming and a number of other uses. When it came to ordinary 78 rpm records, however, the much higher cost of the raw material, as well as its vulnerability to the heavy pickups and crudely mass-produced steel needles still commonly used in home record players, made its general substitution for shellac impractical at that time. During the Second World War, the United States Armed Forces produced thousands of 12-inch 78 rpm V-Discs for use by the troops overseas, as well as 16-inch 33 1/3 rpm War Department radio transcriptions, all of which were made of vinyl.  After the war, the wider use of vinyl became more practical as new record players with lightweight ceramic pickups and precision styli made of sapphire or a very hard and durableosmium alloy started to proliferate. Victor issued some classical music on transparent red vinyl “De Luxe” 78s at a de luxe price, and Decca introduced vinyl “Deccalite” 78s, but other labels confined their use of vinyl to the special thin vinyl DJ pressings of 78s commonly mailed to radio stations during the late 1940s and early 1950s.

78 rpm disc size

In the 1890s, the recording formats of the earliest (toy) discs were mainly 12.5 cm (nominally five inches) in diameter; by the mid-1890s, the discs were usually 7 in (nominally 17.5 cm) in diameter. By 1910 the 10-inch (25.4 cm) record was by far the most popular standard, holding about three minutes of music or other entertainment on a side. From 1903 onwards, 12-inch records (30.5 cm) were also sold commercially, mostly of classical music or operatic selections, with four to five minutes of music per side. Victor, Brunswick and Columbia also issued 12-inch popular medleys, usually spotlighting a Broadway show score. However, other sizes did appear. Eight-inch discs with a 2-inch-diameter (51 mm) label became popular for about a decade in Britain, but they cannot be played in full on most modern record players because the tone arm cannot play far enough in toward the center without modification of the equipment.

78 rpm recording time

The playing time of a phonograph record depended on the turntable speed and the groove spacing. At the beginning of the 20th century, the early discs played for two minutes, the same as early cylinder records.  The 12-inch disc, introduced by Victor in 1903, increased the playing time to three and a half minutes.  Because a 10-inch 78 rpm record could hold about three minutes of sound per side and the 10-inch size was the standard size for popular music, almost all popular recordings were limited to around three minutes in length.

For example, when King Oliver‘s Creole Jazz Band, including Louis Armstrong on his first recordings, recorded 13 sides at Gennett Records in Richmond, Indiana, in 1923, one side was 2:09 and four sides were 2:52–2:59.

By 1938, when Milt Gabler started recording on January 17 for his new label, Commodore Records, to allow longer continuous performances, he recorded some 12-inch records.Eddie Condon explained: “Gabler realized that a jam session needs room for development.” The first two 12-inch recordings did not take advantage of the extra length: “Carnegie Drag” was 3:15; “Carnegie Jump”, 2:41. But, at the second session, on April 30, the two 12-inch recordings were longer: “Embraceable You” was 4:05; “Serenade to a Shylock”, 4:32.

Another way around the time limitation was to issue a selection on both sides of a single record. Vaudeville stars Gallagher and Shean, recorded “Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Shean”, written by Irving and Jack Kaufman, as two-sides of a 10-inch 78 in 1922 for Cameo.

An obvious workaround for longer recordings was to release a set of records. An early multi-record release was in 1903, when HMV in England made the first complete recording of an opera, Verdi‘s Ernani, on 40 single-sided discs.  In 1940, Commodore released Eddie Condon and his Band’s recording of “A Good Man Is Hard to Find” in four parts, issued on both sides of two 12-inch 78s.

This limitation on the duration of recordings persisted from 1910 until the invention of the LP record, in 1948.

In popular music, this time limitation of about 3:30 on a 10-inch 78 rpm record meant that singers usually did not release long pieces on record. One exception is Frank Sinatra‘s recording of Rodgers and Hammerstein‘s “Soliloquy“, from Carousel, made on May 28, 1946. Because it ran 7:57, longer than both sides of a standard 78 rpm 10-inch record, it was released on Columbia‘s Masterwork label (the classical division) as two sides of a 12-inch record.  The same was true of John Raitt‘s performance of the song on the original cast album of Carousel, which had been issued on a 78-RPM album set by American Decca in 1945.

In the 78 era, classical-music and spoken-word items generally were released on the longer 12-inch 78s, about 4–5 minutes per side. For example, on June 10, 1924, four months after the February 12 premier of Rhapsody in BlueGeorge Gershwin recorded a drastically shortened version of the seventeen-minute work with Paul Whiteman and His Orchestra. It was released on two sides of Victor 55225 and runs 8:59.